see: http://www.glassbytes.com/2014/04/connecticut-officials-file-brief-in-support-of-anti-steering-law-in-appellate-court/

"“Applying Zauderer, the District Court properly concluded that Public Act 13-67(c) (2) is constitutional because the requirement to provide the name of a non-affiliated glass repair shop is reasonably related to Connecticut’s interests in protecting consumer choice, preventing steering, and mitigating the impact of self-interested insurance claims administrators—like Safelite—that exercise undue influence and stifle consumer choice,” Connecticut’s attorneys claim."

Connecticut attorneys note that Safelite exercises undue influence and stifles consumer choice. So why do they permit insurance companies to use Safelite to administer auto glass claims? It is such an obvioue conflict of interest.

Why do they permit Safelite to operate a network? The network agreement requires competing auto glass repair facilities to agree to price concessions set by insurance companies which is a clear violation of Fair Trade laws.

Why do they permit insurance companies to collude with Safelite in order to skirt consumer choice laws?

Deep pockets & too many politicians who could care less about the American middle class.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4NCkl0pA38